8.28.2005
The End of Anonymity 3
This should go a long way toward ending anonymity:
New York transit signs $212 million security deal
From the article:
New York transit signs $212 million security deal
From the article:
- New York's subway and bus operator said on Tuesday it awarded a $212 million contract for surveillance cameras, motion detectors and other equipment to detect potential attacks against its stations, bridges and tunnels.
Defense contractor Lockheed Martin will lead a team of companies in a deal struck with North America's largest transportation network just one month after bombers attacked the London transit system on July 7, killing 52 people.
The $212 million will be the first major piece of a $591 million security plan approved in 2002. Before the Lockheed deal, only $42 million had been earmarked.
Lockheed will install 1,000 cameras and 3,000 sensors under the three-year deal that aims to eventually allow the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority to stop attacks before they happen by spotting unattended packages that may contain bombs and alerting its employees to unauthorized intruders in its tunnels and other sensitive areas.
Comments:
<< Home
Archives
It makes for a good headline, but you could more accurately state, "The End of Privacy (Welcome To America)".
www.lp.org
www.lp.org
Anonymous, the end of privacy is exactly what Marshall is describing here. But this is just one small step. In the scheme of things, this is small change. The NYC budget for 2005 is something like 56 billion dollars. (NYC OMB -- June 2004 Adopted Budget, Fiscal Year 2005) From the city's point of view, this is chump change.
Of course Schneier is also correct, it won't do much, if anything, to prevent terrorism. But it's pretty hard to deny that this is a significant step toward universal surveillance. Suppose there were some sort of freeway attack next -- the result will be universal surveillance of roadways.
The thing is, this one step doesn't "end anonymity." It's a process, but I think Marshall is right to point out that this is a consequential precedent, and the trend is real, whether or not it's an effective deterrent, it's happening.
Of course Schneier is also correct, it won't do much, if anything, to prevent terrorism. But it's pretty hard to deny that this is a significant step toward universal surveillance. Suppose there were some sort of freeway attack next -- the result will be universal surveillance of roadways.
The thing is, this one step doesn't "end anonymity." It's a process, but I think Marshall is right to point out that this is a consequential precedent, and the trend is real, whether or not it's an effective deterrent, it's happening.
> "Ending Anonymity" does not prevent terrorism.
It actually could go a long way. The four people did not act alone. The bombers had to get the bombs (or supplies for bomb making) from somewhere. If that transaction were not anonymous, we would eliminate the bomb supply chain. Many like-minded people would be captured by association with the bombers.
It actually could go a long way. The four people did not act alone. The bombers had to get the bombs (or supplies for bomb making) from somewhere. If that transaction were not anonymous, we would eliminate the bomb supply chain. Many like-minded people would be captured by association with the bombers.
That's only true if you have near-total surveillance.
As long as there are significant holes in the network, then you aren't preventing terrorism.
It's only really valuable when it's near-total.
-- Lion
As long as there are significant holes in the network, then you aren't preventing terrorism.
It's only really valuable when it's near-total.
-- Lion
It's a complete sham that politicians foist on the public clamoring for better looking illusions of safety. Hell, if you want real protection, I'd give every American of age concealed weapons permits with weapons training. Counter-intuitively, it would make America the safest nation on earth since any lawbreaker could be killed by the public at large. Police can't stop crime... they usually clean up after it happens.
As I understand it, certain Florida cities have a large concealed weapons permit carrying poplulation and crime is quite low in those areas.
Post a Comment
<< Home
- 08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003
- 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003
- 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003
- 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003
- 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004
- 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
- 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
- 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
- 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
- 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
- 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
- 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
- 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
- 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
- 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
- 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
- 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
- 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
- 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
- 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
- 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
- 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
- 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
- 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
- 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
- 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
- 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
- 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
- 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
- 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
- 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
- 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
- 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
- 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
- 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
- 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
- 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
- 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
- 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
- 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
- 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
- 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
- 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007
- 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
- 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
- 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
- 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007
- 05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008
- 06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008
- 07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008
- 08/01/2008 - 09/01/2008
- 09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008
- 10/01/2008 - 11/01/2008
- 11/01/2008 - 12/01/2008
- 12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009
- 01/01/2009 - 02/01/2009
- 02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009
- 03/01/2009 - 04/01/2009
- 04/01/2009 - 05/01/2009
- 07/01/2009 - 08/01/2009
- 01/01/2011 - 02/01/2011
- 08/01/2011 - 09/01/2011
- 10/01/2011 - 11/01/2011
- 11/01/2011 - 12/01/2011
- 12/01/2011 - 01/01/2012
- 06/01/2012 - 07/01/2012
Atom RSS