4.05.2005
Hundreds of robotic airplanes
			  U.S. Drones Crowd Iraq's Skies to Fight Insurgents
From the article:
			  
			
 
  From the article:
- In the skies over Iraq, the number of remotely piloted aircraft... has shot up to more than 700 now from just a handful four years ago, military officials say.
 
- Never before has the American military used so many remotely piloted aircraft in such diverse missions, and many officers call them the wave of the future.  At a command hub spread among a half dozen dimly lit trailers at this air base just off the Las Vegas Strip, the future is now. Small teams of remote-control warriors nudge joysticks to fly armed Predator aircraft 7,500 miles away. Once the Predators take off in Iraq or Afghanistan for missions, the air crews here take over.
 
	
			Comments:
			
			
 
<< Home
		Archives
		
				 
				The final reasoning is a bit off. Why would you expect an exponential growth from two data points?
Let's look behind the curtain: it still takes more than one human to operate a UAV. They have tried to solve the "swarm" problem for quite some time but little success so far. So if in 4 years the number of operators tripled, that would be very far from exponential growth.
What I'm saying is that you'll simply have more troops in tele-operation missions than before. This is certainly a bit less dire than doomsday predictions of enslavement to our robotic masters :-D. Actually it is a wonderful development because anything that takes troops out of harms way is good, and anything that ends a war faster because better tools are used is good.
I also have a problem with the view that there is an “us” and “them”, as computer enhanced individuals will probably be appearing before robots have full autonomy.
				
				
			
			
			Post a Comment
	
	Let's look behind the curtain: it still takes more than one human to operate a UAV. They have tried to solve the "swarm" problem for quite some time but little success so far. So if in 4 years the number of operators tripled, that would be very far from exponential growth.
What I'm saying is that you'll simply have more troops in tele-operation missions than before. This is certainly a bit less dire than doomsday predictions of enslavement to our robotic masters :-D. Actually it is a wonderful development because anything that takes troops out of harms way is good, and anything that ends a war faster because better tools are used is good.
I also have a problem with the view that there is an “us” and “them”, as computer enhanced individuals will probably be appearing before robots have full autonomy.
<< Home
- 08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003
 - 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003
 - 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003
 - 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003
 - 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004
 - 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
 - 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
 - 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
 - 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
 - 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
 - 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
 - 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
 - 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
 - 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
 - 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
 - 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
 - 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
 - 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
 - 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
 - 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
 - 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
 - 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
 - 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
 - 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
 - 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
 - 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
 - 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
 - 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
 - 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
 - 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
 - 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
 - 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
 - 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
 - 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
 - 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
 - 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
 - 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
 - 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
 - 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
 - 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
 - 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
 - 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
 - 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007
 - 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
 - 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
 - 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
 - 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007
 - 05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008
 - 06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008
 - 07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008
 - 08/01/2008 - 09/01/2008
 - 09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008
 - 10/01/2008 - 11/01/2008
 - 11/01/2008 - 12/01/2008
 - 12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009
 - 01/01/2009 - 02/01/2009
 - 02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009
 - 03/01/2009 - 04/01/2009
 - 04/01/2009 - 05/01/2009
 - 07/01/2009 - 08/01/2009
 - 01/01/2011 - 02/01/2011
 - 08/01/2011 - 09/01/2011
 - 10/01/2011 - 11/01/2011
 - 11/01/2011 - 12/01/2011
 - 12/01/2011 - 01/01/2012
 - 06/01/2012 - 07/01/2012
 

